Board Logo
« Laci Peterson »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jan 18th, 2018, 03:51am



« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 2 3 4  ...  11 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Laci Peterson  (Read 3155 times)
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Detective Spells Out Theory Of Peterson Death
« Reply #15 on: Oct 1st, 2004, 4:28pm »

10-1-04

(Court TV) After 18 weeks of trial and 167 witnesses, jurors hearing Scott Peterson's murder case still have no clear explanation of how or where his wife, Laci, was killed.

But in a sealed search-warrant request, obtained exclusively by Court TV's Catherine Crier, Modesto police detective Craig Grogan spelled out his theory of how the 27-year-old expectant mother met her end.

In the Feb. 11, 2003, request for a search of Scott Peterson's home and warehouse, the lead detective wrote, "Evidence at the scene suggested that Laci Peterson was the victim of 'soft kill' where there would be limited blood evidence at the scene. The small amount of blood recovered in their bed could indicate a location where Laci Peterson had been assaulted."

Grogan theorized that there was little evidence of a struggle because Laci Peterson was drugged before being killed. She may have been suffocated, he said

http://courttv.com/trials/peterson/100104_crier_ctv.html
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Expert In Peterson Trial Says Bodies May Have Been
« Reply #16 on: Oct 4th, 2004, 8:03pm »

REDWOOD CITY An expert on tides and currents testified Monday that the bodies of Laci Peterson and her fetus may have been dumped into San Francisco Bay near the spot where her husband claims to have gone fishing the day of her disappearance.
Ralph Cheng, a hydrologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, said that based on wind and tidal information, the fetus' body - whether still inside the mother or not - was put in the bay between Brooks Island and the Berkeley Marina.

Cheng cautioned that that was the "highest probability" location.

"Can you predict with any certainty within inches or feet where these bodies would have started from?" asked prosecutor Dave Harris.

"No, I'm afraid not," Cheng replied.

He also acknowledged that he could not reproduce the trajectory for Laci Peterson's body, only a possible path for the fetus. Cheng said the fetus' path was easier to determine because it was lighter and unencumbered

http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/news/100404_nw_peterson_latest.html
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Prosecution Concludes in Peterson Trial
« Reply #17 on: Oct 6th, 2004, 06:47am »

10-5-04

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. -- Prosecutors in the Scott Peterson murder trial called to the stand their 174th and final witness, a police investigator who portrayed the former fertilizer salesman as a man on the run because he killed his pregnant wife, Laci.

Modesto Detective Jon Buehler wrapped up 19 weeks of testimony by the state's witnesses, describing the details of Peterson's arrest on April 19, 2003. The defense begins its case next Tuesday.

Buehler told jurors that Peterson had a large backpack and an overnight bag stuffed with everything from hunting knives and a water purifier to snorkeling and fishing equipment to a shovel and duct tape. Much of the camping equipment had been purchased a month earlier, he said.

Peterson also had several changes of clothes, including seven pairs of shoes, jackets, pants, shorts and sweaters. He had four cell phones, two driver's licenses -- his and his brother's -- six credit cards, including one in girlfriend Amber Frey's name, and nearly $15,000 in cash.

Prosecutor Dave Harris showed photographs of the equipment, found in a Mercedes that Peterson had bought earlier using his mother's first name.

Peterson's attorney Mark Geragos showed photos of similar clothes and equipment found in Peterson's truck months earlier, portraying him as a guy who simply lived out of his vehicle.

Buehler also testified that Peterson also had with him "The Purpose-Driven Life: What on Earth Am I Here For?", a book Frey had given him, along with a card dated Feb. 16, 2003.

"I can only hope that this will come to an end soon," Frey wrote. "I wish I could go back in time. I'm praying for you and your family."

Several flyers advertising a reward for Laci's safe return were found in the trunk, Buehler said.

On the day he was arrested, Peterson drove a circuitous nearly 170-mile route in Southern California in what prosecutors suggested was an attempt to evade police. Defense lawyers have maintained Peterson was trying to elude media scrutiny.

The state alleges Peterson killed his eight-months pregnant wife in their Modesto home on or around Dec. 24, 2002, then dumped her body into the bay. Her badly decomposed remains -- and that of her fetus -- washed up in April 2003, not far from the marina where Peterson launched his boat that Christmas Eve morning for what he said was a solo fishing trip.

http://www.nynewsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ats-ap_us19oct06,0,3709501.story?coll=ny-nationalnews-headlines
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Defense to begin its case Tuesday
« Reply #18 on: Oct 11th, 2004, 10:43am »

REDWOOD CITY -- Laci Peterson was abducted by a crew of dark-skinned men driving a brown or beige van, and she and her baby died days or weeks after Scott Peterson reported her missing, defense attorney Mark Geragos has argued throughout Peterson's capital-murder trial.
While the burden of proof is on the prosecution, Geragos, in his opening statement, also opted to shoulder the burden by proclaiming his client's innocence. "The evidence is going to show clearly, beyond any doubt, that not only is Scott Peterson not guilty, but Scott Peterson is stone-cold innocent," Geragos told the jury in his opening statement.

Tuesday the gregarious defense attorney takes center stage to present his case to the six men and six women of the jury. At the heart of Geragos' case is raising reasonable doubt about when the Petersons' baby died. The gestational age would have been 33 weeks if Laci died on Dec. 23 or 24, 2002, as prosecutors contend.

To prove his theory, Geragos is expected to call a forensic pathologist to the stand who will testify that the baby was 36 to 38 weeks old when it died.

Geragos has said that he believes the baby was cut out of Laci's womb and strangled, and points to a line of plastic material found tied in a noose around its neck as evidence that the child was removed from the womb before it died.

The prosecution's forensic pathologist, Dr. Bruce Peterson, determined that the baby did not exit through Laci's birth canal, but through a tear in the top of her uterus. Dr. Peterson said the decomposition from seawater and sea creatures is what freed the baby from Laci's body, and that the plastic tied around the neck was ocean debris that wrapped around the tiny body as it floated to shore.

"It was Laci's death that caused Conner's death in the uterus," Dr. Peterson stated firmly last month.

But the baby's gestational age is the area where the prosecution's experts were most tenuous. Dr. Gregory DeVore and Dr. Alison Galloway, using two different scientific methods, placed the baby's age from 33 to 38 weeks old.

In addition to the debate over the baby's gestational age, Geragos will also have to address the most damaging evidence the prosecution has presented: the fact that the bodies washed ashore exactly where Scott Peterson said he had been fishing.

Geragos argues the real killers learned of Peterson's alibi in the media, and planted the bodies there to get away with their crime. Throughout the trial, Geragos has also pointed out that dive teams equipped with high-tech equipment never found the bodies or the anchors prosecutors believe Peterson used to sink his wife's body to the Bay's muddy bottom.

"The argument is that the divers had all of this incredible equipment -- why didn't they find a body and some anchors?" said Paula Canny, a defense lawyer and former prosecutor following the trial.

And Geragos has benefited throughout the five months of testimony and more than 170 witnesses from the fact that investigators have found no physical evidence -- no blood, tissue or excrement -- to help prove their case.

In addition, Geragos exploited numerous mistakes, lies and misjudgments on the part of police and other prosecution witnesses as he sought to undermine the prosecution's credibility.

Complete Article:
http://www.trivalleyherald.com/Stories/0,1413,86~10669~2460154,00.html
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Peterson Trial Delayed - New Defense Witness Added
« Reply #19 on: Oct 12th, 2004, 7:53pm »

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. (AP) - The judge in the Scott Peterson murder trial on Tuesday delayed the start of the defence case for a week.

Judge Alfred Delucchi said the delay was the result of "legal issues." A source familiar with the case told The Associated Press that the delay came after defence lawyers provided prosecutors with an updated list of witnesses, and prosecutors asked for time to prepare.

"I hate to tell you this . . . but we've got some problems that have arisen here. Some legal issues have come up," Delucchi told jurors after a half-hour, closed-door meeting with lawyers. "I know your time is important. This case is important, too."

It was unclear who the new witnesses were; the list is sealed and lawyers are bound by a gang order.

Delucchi estimates that closing arguments will begin the first week of November.

Prosecutors rested their case Oct. 5 after presenting 174 witnesses over 19 weeks. The defence was to begin its case Tuesday.

Prosecutors allege Peterson killed his pregnant wife on or around Dec. 24, 2002, then dumped her body into San Francisco Bay. The bodies of Laci Peterson and the fetus she carried washed up about four months later, a few kilometres from where Peterson claims to have been fishing alone the day his wife vanished.

Defence lawyers claim someone else abducted Laci and possibly held her captive while police focused on Peterson, then crudely cut the fetus from her body before framing her husband after learning of his widely publicized alibi
http://www3.cjad.com/content/cp_article.asp?id=/global_feeds/canadianpress/worldnews/w101275A.htm
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Experts: Scott Peterson Likely Won't Testify
« Reply #20 on: Oct 15th, 2004, 11:42pm »

LOS ANGELES -- The witness stand can be a dangerous place for a defendant.

Objections from defense lawyers can be seen by jurors as an attempt to hide something. Cross examination can be brutal, exposing the alleged perpetrator to a host of vulnerabilities. Personality and demeanor often overwhelm the actual testimony.

"Even innocent defendants can look guilty on the witness stand," said Loyola Law School professor Laurie Levenson.

It's a chance Scott Peterson's attorneys likely won't take.

In nearly 19 weeks of trial on charges of killing his wife and the fetus she carried, Peterson has already become his own worst witness. Jurors have seen and heard him lie repeatedly to his mistress, to reporters, to police, and to friends and family members on wiretapped phone calls and videotapes.

"Peterson is a compulsive liar," Levenson said. "If he takes the witness stand, the prosecution has such an easy way to undermine his credibility ... If he's willing to lie about small things to (his mistress) Amber Frey and to family members, imagine what he would lie about if his life were on the line."

Defense lawyers have tried to explain away his behavior as that of a man on the run from a crush of media -- not from police, as prosecutors claim. When the defense begins presenting its case next week, his attorneys may point to another reason for his seemingly odd and evasive actions -- death threats that had Peterson fearing for his life.

That detail could also help explain some powerful testimony from police that Peterson sought to sell his home -- fully furnished -- in the weeks after his pregnant wife, Laci, vanished, and while authorities were still searching for her.

But that argument also might be undercut if Peterson is cross-examined about his actions.

And most experts agree that defense lawyer Mark Geragos has done a good job at presenting Peterson's case through the cross-examination of prosecution witnesses, raising at least some reasonable doubt that Peterson is the killer -- and suggesting that the government has fallen short of meeting its burden of proof.

"It would really be a huge mistake in a case like this ... because it would throw away all of the benefits of being able to say they simply haven't proved their case," said Peter Keane, a professor at Golden Gate Law School.

Staying off the witness stand is nothing new in criminal trials. Homemaker maven Martha Stewart didn't testify in her own defense before being convicted for lying about a stock sale. David Westerfield, who was sentenced to death for kidnapping and killing a 7-year-old San Diego girl, also didn't take the stand.

O.J. Simpson also didn't testify -- and was acquitted for the killings of his ex-wife and her friend. Experts say he made the right choice given his record of domestic violence. His character was too easily impeached. After he was forced by law to take the stand in the wrongful-death civil case against him, he was held liable for the deaths and ordered to pay $33.5 million.

"I was there and when O.J. took the witness stand, he looked like a killer, he would clench his jaw and make a fist," Levenson said.

Complete article:
http://www.nbc5.com/news/3825158/detail.html
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Peterson defense begins chipping away at ....
« Reply #21 on: Oct 19th, 2004, 08:12am »

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. (AP) -- Scott Peterson's attorneys launched their defense Monday, striking at a key prosecution theory in the murder case: that Peterson lied when he told police he used the same cement to make a boat anchor and repair his driveway.
Prosecutors have claimed Peterson made five cement anchors, one of which was found in the boat authorities allege he used to dispose of his pregnant wife Laci's body. The other four, which they allege he used to sink her body in San Francisco Bay, have not been found.

Peterson told police he made only one anchor and used the rest of the 90-pound bag of cement to repair his driveway. A prosecution witness testified earlier that the concrete samples taken by police from Peterson's driveway were not from the same mix as the anchor.

But Steven Gabler, a concrete expert asked to examine samples taken from Peterson's driveway by the defense, testified Monday the samples matched the anchor.

"They're all consistent ... with each other," Gabler said.

Prosecution witness Robert O'Neill, president of Micro-Chem Laboratories, previously testified that material from the driveway was inconsistent with the anchor because the driveway sample contained large, gravel-like chunks.

Defense lawyer Mark Geragos has suggested Peterson simply poured the cement mix onto the driveway where the larger rocks already were and that's when the two mixed.



O'Neill disagreed, and defended his position by saying: "The larger rocks were obviously mixed in with the material."

But Gabler, an engineer with Construction Technology Laboratories Inc., testified that the gravel chunks adhered to the concrete in the driveway because the concrete was laid atop them.

Geragos then suggested that further testing could provide even more accurate results, creating a so-called "fingerprint" that might identify the manufacturer of the concrete samples. He prosecutors had failed to do this.

Prosecutor Dave Harris has suggested the concrete samples taken by a defense investigator last month may have been contaminated by construction work being done by Peterson's neighbor close to the driveway where the samples were collected.

Prosecutors allege Peterson killed Laci on or around Dec. 24, 2002, then dumped her body in the bay. The bodies of Laci Peterson and the fetus she carried washed up about four months later, a few miles from where Peterson claims to have been fishing alone the day his wife vanished.

Read the Complete Article:
http://www.azdailysun.com/non_sec/nav_includes/story.cfm?storyID=96378
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Dog vs. Dog in Peterson Case 10-20-04
« Reply #22 on: Oct 20th, 2004, 8:06pm »

Testimony in the Peterson case Wednesday claimed that a trained dog searching the Berkeley Marina for Laci Peterson's scent couldn't find it.

That contradicts the testimony of the woman who handled another scent dog named Trimble. That witness said Trimble did pick up Laci Peterson's scent at the marina.

"How do you impeach a dog? You bring in another dog," said legal analyst Dean Johnson.

Defense attorney is calling witnesses to refute the prosecution case point by point, so the jury has to decide which witness to believe. If Laci was at the marina, it bolsters the prosecution's theory Scott took her there to dump her in the San Francisco Bay. If Laci wasn't at the marina, then the defense gets a boost.

"The witness also said Laci's scent could have gotten to the marina just from Scott's truck," said legal analyst Jim Hammer. "She didn't have to be there."

East Bay Regional Park Police Officer Timothy Philipps discovered a large piece of plastic some 800 feet from where Laci's body was found. In court Wednesday, Philipps said the smell of Laci's decomposed body was on that plastic. Geragos used that testimony to link the bag to Laci's death, implying she could have been wrapped in it, likely by someone other than Scott. However, scientists who analyzed the bag found no evidence on it to link it to Laci.

Meantime, legal analyst Michael Cardoza who conducted a mock cross-examination of Scott Peterson over the weekend has been barred by the judge from commenting any longer about the case. Additionally, the juror who fell ill Tuesday was back in the jury box Wednesday.

http://cbs5.com/news/local/2004/10/20/Dog_vs._Dog_in_Peterson_Case.html
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Fetus age debated in Peterson trial
« Reply #23 on: Oct 22nd, 2004, 06:43am »

REDWOOD CITY -- Scott Peterson's defense stumbled Thursday when a key expert witness testifying about the gestational age of the Petersons' unborn child admitted he partially based his findings on unreliable information.
The witness, Dr. Charles March, said that the earliest date Laci and Scott Peterson's unborn child could have died was Dec. 29 -- five days after the Modesto woman vanished.

But while March's conclusion supported the central contention of defense attorney Mark Geragos' case -- that the fetus was still alive days after Laci Peterson disappeared -- his combative demeanor under cross-examination and confusing calculations culminated in the exasperated witness asking the prosecution to cut him some slack.

In addition to March's testimony, Judge Alfred Deluccchi announced that he will sequester the jury while they decide Peterson's guilt or innocence. The judge stood by his estimate that the jury will get the case Nov. 3.
But legal experts watching the trial said March's performance was a setback for the defense and that Geragos has his work cut out for him before closing arguments.

March was a crucial defense witness because, in his opening statement, Geragos said that if the gestational age of the Petersons' fetus was more than 33 weeks -- the age prosecutors contend it was when it died -- then Scott Peterson could not have murdered his wife.

One of the prosecution's two experts who testified on this matter, a forensic anthropologist, could only provide a gestational age range of 32 to 40 weeks, based on measurements of the fetus' bones. Another expert, using a bone measurement and Laci Peterson's first ultrasound, estimated that the fetus died around Dec. 23, 2002, which fit the DA's time-of-death theory.

March, a fertility specialist, said determining the gestational age of a dead fetus using ultrasound is "less than a nonscience."

"It's 100 percent impossible to identify by ultrasound a specific date," he said.

March based his calculations on a home pregnancy test Laci allegedly took June 9 -- a fact contained in none of the medical records. The June 9 date was based on the statements of one of Laci's friends, who held a baby shower for Laci. The friend, Renee Tomlinson, said the pregnant woman called her in excitement after learning of the test's results.

Complete Article:
http://www.oaklandtribune.com/Stories/0,1413,82~1865~2484809,00.html
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx More defense witnesses take the stand in Peterson.
« Reply #24 on: Oct 25th, 2004, 06:30am »

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. More defense witnesses are scheduled to take the stand today in Scott Peterson's double-murder trial.

Peterson's attorney Mark Geragos is expected to present the forensic expert who examined the remains of Laci Peterson and her baby. They were found in the San Francisco Bay four months after Laci Peterson disappeared.

Geragos also is expected to call law enforcement officials in an attempt to show that Scott Peterson was targeted as the prime suspect early in the case while other leads were ignored.

Family members may also testify that Scott Peterson was upset with the disappearance of his wife.

http://www.wluctv6.com/Global/story.asp?S=2473120
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Death of Fetus Revisisted 10-26-04
« Reply #25 on: Oct 26th, 2004, 04:49am »

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. -- Laci Peterson's mother told an investigator that her slain daughter informed her she was pregnant on June 9, 2002, the investigator testified Monday.

The testimony by Modesto Detective Craig Grogan was presented by the Scott Peterson defense to bolster the assertion by an expert last week that Laci Peterson's fetus was still alive days after the eight-months-pregnant woman vanished just before Christmas 2002.

The expert witness, Dr. Charles March, had come under heavy attack from prosecutors when he testified that the fetus probably died on Dec. 29, 2002, at the earliest.

Grogan's testimony Monday suggested that Laci Peterson had not informed her own mother of the pregnancy until June 9.

''There's nothing that you know of that suggests any other dates, is that correct?'' asked defense lawyer Mark Geragos.

''Not that I know of,'' he replied.

March said he used the date of June 9, along with bone measurements of the dead fetus and Laci's medical records, to conclude that Dec. 29 was the earliest date of death for the fetus. AP

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-laci26.html
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Some Experts Criticize Peterson Defense Strategy
« Reply #26 on: Oct 26th, 2004, 6:28pm »

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. -- The defense has rested in the Scott Peterson murder trial without calling Peterson to the stand.

It's a strategy that didn't impress some legal experts, some of whom are describing the finish as "disappointing" and "dangerous."

Former prosecutor Dean Johnson said defense lawyer Mark Geragos failed to fulfill any promises made during opening statements. As a result, Johnson says the case will come down to reasonable doubt.

Peterson is charged with two counts of murder in the deaths of his pregnant wife, Laci, and the fetus she carried. He faces the death penalty or life without parole if convicted. The defense maintains someone else abducted and killed Laci Peterson.

The judge told jurors the prosecution would call eight rebuttal witnesses beginning Wednesday. Closing arguments are scheduled to start Monday.

Scott Peterson's parents testified Monday, offering explanations for evidence that prosecutors said indicated that Peterson had been planning to flee to Mexico at the time he was arrested.
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Testimony in Peterson case comes to close
« Reply #27 on: Oct 28th, 2004, 06:15am »

REDWOOD CITY - Jurors in the Scott Peterson murder trial were sent home Wednesday with orders to return Monday for closing arguments after prosecutors and defense attorneys decided against calling additional witnesses.

Prosecutors had said they planned to call eight rebuttal witnesses after Peterson's defense attorneys ended their case Tuesday. But when jurors returned Wednesday afternoon, Judge Alfred A. Delucchi said attorneys for both sides had decided against having additional testimony in the five-month-long case.

''You'll be glad to know the attorneys got together and stipulated to all testimony this afternoon,'' he told jurors after they entered the courtroom. Sighs of apparent relief could be heard from the jury box.

Instead, he read four statements to the jury that both sides had agreed to enter into the record. They dealt with testimony regarding cement work done at the home of a Peterson neighbor, a printed e-mail recovered from the Petersons' home, a store receipt and a printout regarding San Francisco Bay taken from Scott Peterson's computer.

It was not immediately clear how some of that information figured into the case against the former Modesto fertilizer salesman, who is charged with murdering his pregnant wife, Laci, on or around Christmas Eve 2002.

Prosecutors and Peterson's defense attorney are expected to elaborate during closing arguments. Delucchi told jurors they should expect to get the case Nov. 3.

It was unclear who the prosecution's eight rebuttal witnesses were because the list is sealed and attorneys are bound by a gag order.

One of the defense rebuttal witnesses was to be a neighbor of the Petersons who was prepared to testify about the cement and construction work the neighbor had done in his back yard.

Prosecutors claim Peterson made five cement anchors, one of which was found in the boat authorities allege he used to dispose of his wife's body. They said he used the others to sink the body, but those anchors have not been found.

Peterson told police he made only one anchor and used the remainder of the bag of cement to repair his driveway.

A prosecution witness, however, testified the cement samples taken by police from Peterson's driveway were not from the same mix that made the anchor. A defense expert later disagreed, testifying the samples did indeed match.

Prosecutors suggested the concrete samples taken by the defense were contaminated by construction work done by Peterson's neighbor. But the judge on Wednesday read the neighbor's testimony, which said he hadn't done concrete work near the Petersons' driveway.

Prosecutors allege Peterson killed his pregnant wife, then dumped her body into the bay. The bodies of Laci Peterson and the fetus she carried washed up about four months later, a few miles from where Peterson claims to have been fishing alone the day his wife vanished.

Defense lawyers claim someone else abducted and killed Laci, then framed their client after learning of his widely publicized alibi.

The defense called 14 witnesses over six days, while prosecutors called 174 witnesses over 19 weeks.

''If I had to read between the lines... I think the prosecution re-evaluated and felt good about how the case ended. They may have simply pared down their own witness list,'' said Jim Hammer, a former San Francisco prosecutor who has been observing the trial.

http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald/news/10036487.htm
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Peterson Jurors May Get Option Of Second-Degree
« Reply #28 on: Oct 29th, 2004, 07:52am »

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. -- Jurors in Scott Peterson's murder trial may have another choice to consider when they begin deliberations next week.
Discussion

The prosecution is expected to ask that the jury get instructions for second-degree murder along with the first-degree charge already on the table. Legal analyst Chuck Smith said if that happens, defense attorney Mark Geragos would probably argue strongly against it.

Another analyst said it may already be a done deal. Jim Hammer said ordinarily, when judges give instructions to California juries, they usually give rules for both first and second-degree murder.

Closing arguments are scheduled to begin Monday.


Scott Peterson is charged with two counts of pre-meditated, first-degree murder in the deaths of his wife, Laci Peterson, 27, and the couple's unborn child, whose remains were found on the shore of the San Francisco Bay on April 13, 2002.

Scott Peterson was arrested five days later, raising suspicion among some because of his changed appearance (bleached hair and goatee) and location (San Diego). Police also said Scott Peterson was carrying $10,000 in cash and his brother's driver's license. Last week, Scotts family gave reasons for his actions that were considered suspicious during that time.

Laci Peterson was last seen Christmas Eve 2002, when Scott Peterson told investigators he returned from a fishing trip in the San Francisco Bay to find her gone and their dog wearing a muddy leash. She was eight months pregnant.

News surfaced in January that Scott Peterson was having an affair with a Fresno, Calif., woman, Amber Frey, a massage therapist. Later, police told the Laci's family that Scott Peterson took out a $250,000 life insurance policy on his wife, and in February, the family learned that Scott Peterson sold his wife's sport utility vehicle to purchase a new truck.

But although defense attorneys acknowledge Scott Peterson was an unfaithful husband, they say there is no evidence to support the prosecution's assertion that he killed his wife and dumped her body in the San Francisco Bay.


http://www.nbc6.net/news/3871738/detail.html
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
FindCarrie
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

For Carrie Always


Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 6967
xx Have COURT TV Msg Your Phone When Verdict Comes In
« Reply #29 on: Nov 1st, 2004, 5:03pm »

Please visit Court TV and sign up to have them text message your cell phone when the verdict is read on the Scott Peterson trial. Follow this link here to sign up.

http://www.courttvmobile.com/index.php?link=jwlknx
User IP Logged

Caring About All Missing & Murdered People
Please visit www.FindCarrieCulberson.Com
And www.AngelGardenOfHope.Com
My group inspired to help others because of Carrie.
See also our missing & murdered person blog
http://findcarrie.blogspot.com
Pages: 1 2 3 4  ...  11 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls